On debt recovery, defamation, and damages: part 5.¹

On debt recovery, defamation, and damages: part 5.¹

On debt recovery, defamation, and damages: part 5.¹

Published on:

23 Sept 2024

5

min read

#notlegaladvice
#notlegaladvice
#research
#research
#law
#notlegaladvice
#notlegaladvice

This article is part of a series. View related content below:

This article is part of a series. View related content below:

This article is part of a series. View related content below:

Photo credit: Engin Akyurt; https://www.pexels.com/photo/woman-playing-chess-2283803/.

To recap:
(a) at Mr Chan's request, Ms Tang loaned $120,000;
(b) the loans were not repaid. Ms Tang engaged a debt collection company;
(c) Mr Chan successfully sued Ms Tang and the debt collection company for defamation - but was only awarded $1 in damages; and
(d) each party is probably out of pocket. And Mr Chan is bankrupt.

I conclude this series with final² learning points for commercially-minded businesses and businesspeople.

--

2️⃣ Choose who you sue carefully.

Here, the Court held that Ms Tang's loans were to Mr Chan's companies and not Mr Chan himself. As such, Ms Tang's claim³ against Mr Chan for the return of the loans failed.

So consider carefully, and with legal advice, who your claims should be brought against - especially in circumstances where the documentation is patchy,⁴ and it is unclear whether the transaction was entered into with:
(a) the person you dealt with;
(b) someone represented by the agent who you dealt with; or even
(c) a corporate entity whose representative you dealt with.

Some of you might then say: "well, what the heck, I'll just sue them all!"

You could. But there are risks.

If you take a shotgun approach and sue every involved party:
(a) your legal costs escalate; and
(b) if there are parties you do not succeed against, you may have to compensate them for their legal costs.

So choose the right targets before pulling the trigger.

3️⃣ Choose carefully whether to bring defamation claims.

Consider again the figures that I set out in part 3.⁵

For those of us whose reputations have been harmed by a defamatory statement, but who don't happen to be public figures, suing for defamation often leads to a pyrrhic victory at best.

Let's assume that a victim of defamation has a 100% chance of succeeding, but
(a) their expected damages are unlikely to exceed $50k;
(b) their legal costs (for a full trial) are likely to be close to $100k; and
(c) the costs they can recover from the other party are unlikely to exceed $30k.

In this scenario, if the victim sues, they end up out of pocket - and even in the best-case scenario where they succeed completely in their defamation claim.⁶

Now, you may prepared to pay the financial price to vindicate your reputation. I respect that.

But go in with your eyes open, and find a set of lawyers who:
(a) will not overpromise and create unrealistic expectations;
(b) actively work to keep costs under control, such as through Alternative Dispute Resolution and by not taking out unnecessary interlocutory applications; and
(c) actually understand the intricacies of defamation claims and defences.⁷

Because once you have commenced a Court claim, you can't just drop it whenever you want to, and even if you change your mind later on.

--

For those of you who are still here with me, at the end of this multi-part series - I hope you enjoyed the ride.

Disclaimer:

The content of this article is intended for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Footnotes:
Footnotes:

¹ Part 1: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/khelvin-xu_footnotes-defamation-litigation-activity-7221762468455309313-N1wh/.
Part 2: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/khelvin-xu_footnotes-defamation-litigation-activity-7223550200143917058-BtrP/.
Part 3: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/khelvin-xu_footnotes-defamation-litigation-activity-7226437895207710721-h6_m/.
Part 4: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/khelvin-xu_footnotes-defamation-litigation-activity-7231515974586220545-Cv4R/.

² See part 4 for the first learning point.

³ Well, strictly speaking, her counterclaim.

⁴ The better solution is to consult a lawyer at the time when the transaction is entered into, to ensure that the documentation is in order. But hey, you can't turn back time.

⁵ Where I set out the likely actual financial consequences of Mr Chan suing for defamation.

⁶ I recognise that this sounds unfair. The amount of time, effort, and expense it takes to obtain recompense for a defamatory statement can be completely out of proportion to the effort it takes to make a defamatory statement in the first place. But that's the present system, like it or not.

⁷ Defamation is actually a surprisingly technical area of law, with a number of unique defences. There have also been several recent legal developments, as Courts grapple with how to apply 20th-century concepts in the age of the Internet, and with the ubiquity of online messaging platforms and social media.

Never miss a post

Never miss a post
Never miss a post
Share It On: